HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF WRITTEN PEER FEEDBACK IN WRITING CLASSES

Authors

  • Nguyen Thi Thu Ha English for Specific Purposes Department, Hanoi city, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0071

Keywords:

written peer feedback, perceptions, writing

Abstract

Peer feedback is becoming an increasingly valuable part of EFL writing classes, especially as Vietnamese schools shift toward more student-centred approaches, since it encourages active participation, fosters learner autonomy, and helps students develop critical thinking skills. Although much has been studied in higher education settings, there is less understanding of how younger students respond to this method. This study explored the perspectives of high school students in Hanoi by analyzing both their written feedback and reflections during interviews. A qualitative method was employed, utilising semi-structured interviews and analysis of written peer feedback from eight high school students. The research found that students generally had positive views of peer feedback, noting several benefits, such as improved writing abilities, critical thinking skills, and increased confidence. Additionally, the paper highlights several challenges, including the dependability and quality of feedback.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003

[3] Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer review. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci004

[4] Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020b). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58, 492–526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266

[5] Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103

[6] Lei, Z. (2017). Salience of student written feedback by peer-revision in EFL writing class. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p151

[7] Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.294

[8] Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. L. (Eds.). (1992). Student perceptions in the classroom. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[9] Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.

[10] Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa

[11] Nguyen, T. H. (2016). Peer feedback practice in EFL tertiary writing classes. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p76

[12] Tsui, A. B., & Ng, M. (2000). Does secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 147–170.

[13] Leki, I. (1990). Preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203–218.

[14] Min, H. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308.

[15] Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing. System, 47, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007

[16] Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 217–233.

[17] Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

[18] Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1

[19] Harutyunyan, L., & Poveda, M. F. (2018). Students’ perception of peer review in an EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p138

[20] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

[21] Holliday, A. (2015). Qualitative research and analysis. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 49–62). Bloomsbury.

[22] Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

[23] Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

[24] Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[25] Regmi, K., Naidoo, J., & Pilkington, P. (2010). Understanding the processes of translation and transliteration in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 16–26.

[26] Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.

[27] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[28] Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study. Assessing Writing, 33, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004

[29] Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

[30] Kuyyogsuy, S. (2019). Promoting peer feedback in developing students' English writing ability in L2 writing class. International Education Studies, 12(9), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n9p76

[31] Ho, P. V. P., Thien, N. M., Ly, H. H., & Vy, N. N. H. (2020). The practical perceptions of Vietnamese lecturers and students towards written peer feedback. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(6), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n6p347

[32] Husin, M. S., & Ariffin, K. (2008). Students’ perceptions towards peer feedback approach in a Malaysian English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Jurnal Gading UiTM Pahang, 12(2), 19–34.

[33] Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-09

Issue

Section

Educational Science: Social Science

How to Cite

Thi Thu Ha, N. (2025) “HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF WRITTEN PEER FEEDBACK IN WRITING CLASSES”, Journal of Science Educational Science, 70(4), pp. 78–86. doi:10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0071.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 39

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.