FACTORS INFLUENCING VIETNAMESE EFL TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY IN THE MEKONG DELTA

Authors

  • Tran Huu Nghi School of Foreign Languages, Can Tho University, Can Tho city, Vietnam
  • Ngo Huynh Hong Nga School of Foreign Languages, Can Tho University, Can Tho city, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2026-0011

Keywords:

factor, professional development (PD), EFL teacher, motivation, systematic barrier, self-directed learning

Abstract

Given current global trends in education, professional development (PD) of English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers is paramount. In Vietnam, effective PD programs have become even more crucial because of various systematic and personal barriers. Grounded in Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological systems theory (1979), this qualitative study explores factors affecting Vietnamese EFL teachers' PD. Data were gathered from semi-structured interviews with six EFL teachers. The findings reveal that personal motivation and self-directed learning were the significant drivers of PD, while financial constraints, limited institutional support, and misaligned policies impeded meaningful PD engagement. Furthermore, global trends and national policies present both opportunities and challenges for EFL teachers' PD. This study suggests that PD programs should be more practical, collaborative, and sensitive to their contexts and tailor-made to assist rural EFL teachers overcome challenges pertinent to them. The findings emphasize the need for flexible and accessible PD opportunities to facilitate EFL teachers’ professional growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Coldwell M, (2017). Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: A path model approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61(2017), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.015.

[2] Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF & Yoon KS, (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

[3] Borg S, (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

[4] Heystek J & Terhoven R, (2014). Motivation as critical factor for teacher development in contextually challenging underperforming schools in South Africa. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.940628.

[5] Truong V, (2017). In search of effective professional development of EFL teachers in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 33(3), 157-166.

[6] MOET, (2008). Vietnamese National Foreign Languages Project. Ministry of Education and Training.

[7] PLH Huong & HTT Chi, (2022). A study on professional development needs of EFL teachers at upper secondary schools in Central Vietnam. Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities, 131(6C), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v131i6C.6903.

[8] Diaz-Maggioli G, (2004). Teacher-centered professional development. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

[9] Broadley T, (2012). Enhancing professional learning for rural educators by rethinking connectedness. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22(1), 85–105.

[10] Noom-Ura S, (2013). English-teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers' professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 139-147.

[11] Dhanavel SP, (2022). Continuing professional development of English language teachers: Perspectives and practices from India. Springer.

[12] Avalos B, (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007.

[13] Mohan PP, (2016). A study on novice and experienced teacher perceptions of professional development in Fiji. Waikato Journal of Education, 21(1), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v21i1.265.

[14] Borg S, (2018). Evaluating the impact of professional development. RELC Journal, 49(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218784371.

[15] Johnston B, (2009). Collaborative teacher development. The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education, 241-249.

[16] Richards JC, (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

[17] TT My & Murray J, (2019). Understanding obstacles to online professional development through the lens of EFL teachers’ attitudes: A qualitative study in Vietnam. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(3), 23-40.

[18] Guskey TR & Yoon KS, (2009). What works in professional development?. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000709.

[19] Azaza M, Litz D & Hourani RB, (2023). Investigating teacher professional learning in a context of change: A UAE case study. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2021.1879166.

[20] NHH Nga, (2021). Professional development experiences of English as a foreign language lecturers at a Vietnamese university [Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University]. Victoria University of Wellington.

[21] EHT Thao, (2022). Teachers’ perceptions on EFL professional development at a public university in Vietnam. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 34(2), 376–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v34.2.4682.

[22] Bronfenbrenner U, (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

[23] Richter D, Kunter M, Klusmann U, Lüdtke O & Baumert J, (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008.

[24] Creswell JW & Creswell JD, (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

[25] Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE & Hyun HH, (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

[26] Merriam SB & Tisdell EJ, (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

[27] Braun V & Clarke V, (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

[28] Clarke V & Braun V, (2016). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.

[29] Roberts K, Dowell A & Nie J, (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y.

[30] Aisyah M, Setiawan S & Mustofa A, (2023). The EFL teachers’ perception self-directed professional development toward oral language maintenance. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 16(1), 39-54.

[31] Yaccob NS, Yunus MM & Hashim H, (2022). Globally competent teachers: English as a second language teachers’ perceptions on global competence in English lessons. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(2022), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925160.

[32] Saberi L & Amiri F, (2016). A qualitative study of Iranian EFL university teachers' attitude towards professional development. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0703.22.

Published

2026-01-26

Issue

Section

Educational Science: Social Science

How to Cite

Huu Nghi, T. and Huynh Hong Nga, N. (2026) “FACTORS INFLUENCING VIETNAMESE EFL TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY IN THE MEKONG DELTA”, Journal of Science Educational Science, 71(1), pp. 107–117. doi:10.18173/2354-1075.2026-0011.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 265

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.