EFL TEACHERS’ EMOTIONS ABOUT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN UNIVERSITY CONTEXT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Dinh Thi Thu Trang Faculty of English Language and Culture University of Languages and International Studies, VNU, Hanoi city, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Hai Ha Faculty of English Language and Culture University of Languages and International Studies, VNU, Hanoi city, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0126

Keywords:

AI technologies, teacher emotion, control value theory

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly integrated into education, teachers encounter new opportunities and challenges that influence their professional practices and provoke a wide range of emotional responses. Employing the Control-Value Theory (CVT) and in-depth interviews, this study explores the emotional experiences of 10 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers of a public university in Vietnam who use AI technologies in their teaching. The participants expressed excitement about AI’s potential support for teaching and research but showed doubts about its limitations and concerns regarding the impacts on students, classroom interactions and academic integrity. They also experienced frustration with the lack of institutional support but conveyed a boosted sense of confidence in their irreplaceable human expertise. These mixed findings largely align with previous studies on the integration of AI-powered tools in education, support the applicability of CVT for investigating teacher emotions and extend the discussion on the affective dimension of AI-assisted EFL instruction. Although limited by the small sample size, this study contributes to advancing knowledge about the complexity of teacher emotions and calls for more comprehensive support systems to facilitate teachers in managing the pedagogical and emotional demands of AI integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Lo CK, Yu PLH, Xu S, & Hew TKF, (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5

[2] Ho PXP, (2024). Using ChatGPT in English language learning: A study on IT students’ attitudes, habits, and perceptions. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24414

[3] Hua HH & Le TT, (2024). Exploring the impact of AI in language education: Vietnamese EFL teachers’ views on using ChatGPT for fairy tale retelling tasks. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.24

[4] Le TT, Hua HH & Pham TT, (2023). Exploring the impacts of ChatGPT in EFL writing: Student perceptions of opportunities and challenges in Vietnamese higher education. Kognisi: Jurnal Ilmu Keguruan, 1(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.59698/kognisi.v1i2.175

[5] Nguyen TTH, (2023). EFL teachers’ perspectives toward the use of ChatGPT in writing classes: A case study at Van Lang University. Journal of Language Instruction, 2(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.23231

[6] Thai TCT, (2023). English pedagogy students' attitudes and expectations towards ChatGPT: A study at Hanoi University of Education. Journal of Education, 23(10), 51–56. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/767 (Vietnamese).

[7] Yen PH, Thu HTA, Thi NA, Tra NH & Thuy PT, (2024). University teachers’ perceptions on the integration of ChatGPT in language education assessment: Challenges, benefits, and ethical considerations. In The 20th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2023) (pp. 7–21). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-396-2_2

[8] Nguyen DL, (2025). Leveraging ChatGPT to enhance task response and grammatical range and accuracy in IELTS essay writing. HNUE Journal of Sciences, 70(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0067 (Vietnamese).

[9] Yang L & Zhao S, (2024). AI-induced emotions in L2 education: Exploring EFL students’ perceived emotions and regulation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108337

[10] Zhu M & Wang C, (2025). A systematic review of artificial intelligence in language education: Current status and future implications. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73606

[11] Pekrun R, (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

[12] Shen Y & Guo H, (2024). "I feel AI is neither too good nor too bad": Unveiling Chinese EFL teachers' perceived emotions in generative AI-mediated L2 classes. Computers in Human Behavior, 161, 108429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108429

[13] Seyri H & Ghiasvand F, (2025). “Teaching is basically feeling”: Unpacking EFL teachers’ perceived emotions and regulatory strategies in AI-powered L2 speaking and writing skills instruction. Computers and Education Open, 8, 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100264

[14] Zembylas M, (2007). Theory and methodology in researching emotions in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701207785

[15] Chen J, (2021). Refining the teacher emotion model: Evidence from a review of literature published between 1985 and 2019. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(3), 327–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1831440

[16] Farouk S, (2012). What can the self-conscious emotion of guilt tell us about primary school teachers’ moral purpose and the relationships they have with their pupils? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.696049

[17] Hargreaves A, (1998). The emotional politics of teaching and teacher development: With implications for educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(4), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360312980010401

[18] Schutz PA & Lanehart SL, (2002). Introduction: Emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_1

[19] Bahroun Z, Anane C, Ahmed V & Zacca A, (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983

[20] Pokrivcakova S, (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025

[21] Albadarin Y, Saqr M, Pope N & Tukiainen M, (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education, 3(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2

[22] Crompton H & Burke D, (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68(2), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0

[23] Farrokhnia M, Banihashem SK, Noroozi O & Wals A, (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

[24] Topsakal O & Topsakal E, (2022). Framework for a foreign language teaching software for children utilizing AR, voicebots and ChatGPT (large language models). The Journal of Cognitive Systems, 7(2), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.52876/jcs.1227392

[25] Tlili A, Shehata B, Adarkwah MA, Bozkurt A, Hickey DT, Huang R & Agyemang B, (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

[26] Cotton DR, Cotton PA & Shipway JR, (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

[27] Kostka I & Toncelli R, (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3), n3. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int

[28] Darwin, Rusdin D, Mukminatien N, Suryati N, Laksmi ED & Marzuki, (2023). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2290342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342

[29] Derakhshan A & Ghiasvand F, (2024). Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research‐active EFL teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1246–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12561

[30] Gao Y, Wang Q & Wang X, (2024). Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education: A study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305173

[31] Frenzel AC, Daniels L & Burić I, (2021). Teacher emotions in the classroom and their implications for students. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1985501

[32] Li J, Bai B & Liu H, (2025). When technology meets emotions: Exploring preschool teachers' emotion profiles in technology use. Computers & Education, 236, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105355

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Section

Educational Science: Social Science

How to Cite

Thi Thu Trang, D. and Hai Ha, N. (2025) “EFL TEACHERS’ EMOTIONS ABOUT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN UNIVERSITY CONTEXT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”, Journal of Science Educational Science, 70(7), pp. 24–33. doi:10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0126.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 186

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.