DESIGNING EXERCISES ACCORDING TO THE AMERICAN COLLEGE TESTING (ACT) APPROACH TO ASSESS STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC THINKING COMPETENCE IN TEACHING THE TOPIC “ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT” IN BIOLOGY GRADE 12
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0103Keywords:
scientific thinking competence, American College Testing, exercises, Ecology and EnvironmentAbstract
In the context of the ongoing shift from content-based to competence-based education, the development of assessment tools that validly and reliably measure student competencies has become an essential priority. This study addresses this need by proposing and operationalizing a framework for assessing scientific thinking competence, drawing on the structure of the American College Testing (ACT) approach. The framework encompasses three core components: (1) Interpretation of Data (IOD); (2) Scientific Investigation (SIN); and (3) Evaluation of Models, Inferences, and Experimental Results (EMI). The study’s principal contribution lies in translating this conceptual structure into a systematic process for designing ACT-oriented assessment instruments that extend beyond factual recall to capture higher-order cognitive processes. Applying this process to the Grade 12 Biology topic “Ecology and Environment” resulted in the development of 22 item clusters, comprising 160 questions in four formats: choice, short answer, true/false, and drag-and-drop, illustrating a practical pathway for embedding competence-based assessment into science education to more effectively evaluate and promote advanced levels of student thinking.
Downloads
References
[1] Ministry of Education and Training, (2018). Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT on The Promulgation of the General Education Curriculum, Hanoi (in Vietnamese).
[2] OECD, (2025). PISA 2025 science framework. OECD Publishing. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/.
[3] National Research Council, (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
[4] Zimmerman C, (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001.
[5] Kuhn D, (2010). What is scientific thinking, and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed.), 497–523. Wiley-Blackwell.
[6] Lawson AE, (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150103.
[7] Gormally C, Brickman P, Lutz M, (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
[8] Nguyen TLQ, Nguyen VB, (2024). Constructing questions for evaluating scientific thinking. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 299(01/S), 20–27 (in Vietnamese).
[9] Hoang TT, Nguyen PT, (2024). Influencing factors in the implementation of Vietnam’s 2018 National Curriculum: A case study of geography teachers in selected Northern provinces. HNUE Journal of Science, 69(5), 45–54 (in Vietnamese).
[10] Mellati M, Khademi M, (2018). Exploring teachers’ assessment literacy: Impact on learners’ writing achievements and implications for teacher development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 1–18.
[11] Nguyen TH, (2014). Competence-based teaching and assessing in education: Some basic theoretical issues. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 30(2), 56–64 (in Vietnamese).
[12] Nguyen TNB, (2014). Initial exploration into the concept of competence-based assessment and suggestions of some methods to assess students’ language and literature competence. HCMUE Journal of Science, 56, 157–165 (in Vietnamese).
[13] Wertheimer M, (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.
[14] Dunbar K, Klahr D, (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning.
[15] Lehrer R, Schauble L, (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In Renninger KA, Sigel IE, Damon W, Lerner RM (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice, 153–196. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[16] Pham TPA, Phan DD, Nguyen TDP, (2024). High school students’ critical thinking competency in teaching biology. Hue University Journal of Science, 133(6C), 119–131 (in Vietnamese).
[17] Nguyen HT, Nguyen TH, (2021). Training for critical thinking for high school students to meet the requirements of education innovation. HNUE Journal of Science, 66(1), 46–56 (in Vietnamese).
[18] Nguyen TB, (2025). Developing critical thinking in history education: A case study at Hanoi Vinschool secondary school. HNUE Journal of Science, 70(1), 26–35 (in Vietnamese).
[19] Nguyen NT, (2002). Developing students’ scientific thinking through philosophy instruction at the College of Foreign Languages, Vietnam National University, Hanoi. VNU Journal of Science: Foreign Languages, 18(2), 52–58 (in Vietnamese).
[20] Vu TTT, Pham TTN, Nguyen TTN, Hoang PH, Chu HM, (2022). Organizing teaching and learning of practical experiments in the 10th biology curriculum according to the approach to develop scientific thinking. Biological Research and Teaching in Vietnam – 5th National Scientific Conference, International University – VNU Ho Chi Minh City, 1148–1156 (in Vietnamese).
[21] Steven WD, (2008). 10 ACT practice tests (2nd ed.). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
[22] American College Testing Program, (1989). Preliminary technical manual for the enhanced ACT assessment. American College Testing Program Publications. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338714.
[23] Ben Clay, (2001). Is this a trick question? (A short guide to writing effective test questions). Kansas Curriculum Center.
[24] Pellegrino S, Chudowsky N, Glaser R, (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press.
[25] Högström P, Gericke N, Wallin J, Bergman E, (2024). Teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Science & Education, 1–44.
[26] Eraut M, (1998). Concepts of competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12(2), 127–139.
[27] Dang TH, (2012). Competence and competence-based education. Journal of Educational Management, 43, 18–26 (in Vietnamese).
[28] Ministry of Education and Training, (2018). General Education Curriculum. General Curriculum (Promulgated together with Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT dated December 26, 2018), Hanoi (in Vietnamese).
[29] Vázquez-Parra JC, Castillo-Martínez IM, Ramírez-Montoya MS, Millán A, (2022). Development of the perception of achievement of complex thinking: A disciplinary approach in a Latin American student population. Educational Sciences, 12(5), 289–300.
[30] ACT, (n.d.). ACT College & Career Readiness Standards – Science. ACT. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/CCRS-ScienceStandards.pdf.
[31] ACT, Inc., (2018). ACT Assessment Test Form A09 (April 2018): Test Information Release booklet. ACT, Inc., 1–55.
