CÁC NHÂN TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG ĐẾN SỰ TỰ TIN TỔ CHỨC HOẠT ĐỘNG KHÁM PHÁ KHOA HỌC THEO TIẾP CẬN TÌM TÒI – KHÁM PHÁ CỦA GIÁO VIÊN MẦM NON
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2024-0077Từ khóa:
giáo dục mầm non, học tập tìm tòi – khám phá, khám phá khoa học, mẫu giáo, sự tự tin, giáo viênTóm tắt
Nghiên cứu này được thực hiện nhằm khám phá những nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến sự tự tin tổ chức hoạt động khám phá khoa học cho trẻ mẫu giáo theo tiếp cận tìm tòi – khám phá của giáo viên mầm non. Mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính theo phương pháp bình phương tối thiểu (PLS SEM) được sử dụng để phân tích dữ liệu khảo sát 137 giáo viên nhằm trả lời các giả thuyết nghiên cứu. Kết quả nghiên cứu chỉ ra rằng các yếu tố kiến thức chuyên môn và điều kiện tổ chức hoạt động có tác động đến sự tự tin của giáo viên, trong khi đó sự hỗ trợ của các bên liên quan không ảnh hưởng đáng kể. Các kết quả này đề xuất rằng việc bồi dưỡng kiến thức chuyên môn và kĩ năng giảng dạy có thể là hướng tiếp cận hiệu quả nhất để hỗ trợ giáo viên mầm non trong việc tổ chức hoạt động khoa học cho trẻ mẫu giáo theo tiếp cận tìm tòi – khám phá.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Tài liệu tham khảo
[1] Bruner JS, (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review.
[2] Suchman JR, (1962). The elementary school training program in scientific inquiry. Scientific Inquiry. Urbana University of Illinois Press.
[3] NT Vĩnh, TVU Nhi & LN Tú, (2023). Tổ chức hoạt động khám phá khoa học cho trẻ mẫu giáo theo tiếp cận tìm tòi–khám phá: điều kiện, các yếu tố hỗ trợ và sự sẵn lòng của giáo viên. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 228(12), 142-148.
[4] Lombardi D, Sinatra GM, Bailey JM, & Butler LP, (2024). Seeking a Comprehensive Theory About the Development of Scientific Thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09911-z
[5] Köksal Ö, (2022). Scientific Thinking in Young Children: Development, Culture, and Education. In H. H. Şen and H. Selin (Eds.), Childhood in Turkey: Educational, Sociological, and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 225-246). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08208-5_16
[6] Yang W & Lin X, (2024). A Chinese Style of STEM Inquiry?: The Discourse of Inquiry-Based STEM Education Among Chinese Early Childhood Practitioners. In Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education in the Early Years (pp. 26-41). Routledge.
[7] García-Rodeja I, Barros S, & Sesto V, (2024). Inquiry-Based Activities with Woodlice in Early Childhood Education. Education Sciences, 14(7), 710.
[8] Fleer M, (2019). Scientific Playworlds: a Model of Teaching Science in Play-Based Settings. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1257-1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9653-z
[9] Ma L & Anwar K, (2024). The Path of Promoting Primary School Students' Inquiry Ability Through Family Education in China Under Information-Based Technology. Proceeding Education, Science, and Technology International Conference,
[10] Toma RB, Yánez-Pérez I, & Meneses-Villagrá JÁ, (2024). Measuring Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Teaching Inquiry-Based Science and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry. Science & Education, 1-17.
[11] Bathgate ME, Schunn CD, & Correnti R, (2014). Children's motivation toward science across contexts, manner of interaction, and topic. Science Education, 98(2), 189-215.
[12] Kutluca AY & Mercan N, (2022). Exploring the Effects of Preschool Teachers' Epistemological Beliefs on Content-Based Pedagogical Conceptualizations and PCK Integrations towards Science Teaching. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 170-193.
[13] Andersson K & Gullberg A, (2014). What is science in preschool and what do teachers have to know to empower children? Cultural studies of science education, 9, 275-296.
[14] Chen Y-L, Huang L-F, & Wu P-C, (2021). Preservice preschool teachers’ self-efficacy in and need for STEM education professional development: STEM pedagogical belief as a mediator. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 137-147.
[15] Menon D & Sadler TD, (2016). Preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs and science content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 649-673.
[16] NM Tuấn & VTK Trang, (2022). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến thực hành giáo dục STEM của giáo viên mầm non: Một nghiên cứu định lượng ở Việt Nam. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 22(17), 38-44.
[17] Adeyele VO, (2023). Inquiry-based science approach in kindergarten: A systematic review. Al-Mudarris: Journal Of Education, 6(2), 160-179.
[18] Dinh HTT & Nakatsubo F, (2024). Teacher-child Discourse in Vietnamese Preschool Classrooms: An Exploratory Case Study of Teachers’ Questions and Statements in the Planned Science Activity. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1-11.
[19] Mohammed SM & Luguterah AW, (2024). Exploration of science teaching self-efficacy outside professional development context for inquiry-based teaching. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2377840.
[20] Aydeniz M, Bilican K, & Senler B, (2021). Development of the inquiry-based science teaching efficacy scale for primary teachers. Science & Education, 30(1), 103-120.
[21] Oppermann E, Hummel T, & Anders Y, (2021). Preschool teachers’ science practices: Associations with teachers’ qualifications and their self-efficacy beliefs in science. Early child development and care, 191(5), 800-814.
[22] Burić I & Kim LE, (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and instruction, 66, 101302.
[23] Schmitt L, Weber A, Venitz L, & Leuchter M, (2023). Preschool teachers' pedagogical content knowledge predicts willingness to scaffold early science learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 1034-1052.
[24] Pakombwele A & Tsakeni M, (2022). The teaching of science process skills in early childhood development classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 273-280.
[25] Ramanathan G, Carter D, & Wenner J, (2022). A framework for scientific inquiry in preschool. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(7), 1263-1277.
[26] Dinh LT, (2021). Difficulties in implementing STEAM education model at the Northern mountainous preschool in Vietnam, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1835, p. 012020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012020.
[27] Hair Jr JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, & Kuppelwieser VG, (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
[28] Hair Jr JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, & Sarstedt M, (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
[29] Hair Jr JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, & Ray S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature.
[30] Heo M, Kim N, & Faith MS, (2015). Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15, 1-9.
[31] Fornell C & Larcker DF, (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
[32] Cohen JD, (1988). Noncentral chi-square: Some observations on recurrence. The American Statistician, 42(2), 120-122.
[33] Agnes M, (2022). Pengaruh Metode Stroytelling terhadap Minat Baca Siswa. SNHRP, 4, 1045-1051.
