THE COMPETENCE OF APPLYING INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN DEVELOPING LESSON PLANSOF PHYSICS PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS

Authors

  • Tran Ngoc Chat Faculty of Physics, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Ngo Trong Tue Faculty of Physics, Hanoi Pedagogical University 2, Phu Tho, Vietnam
  • Tuong Duy Hai Faculty of Physics, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2026-0031

Keywords:

digital competence, ICT, lesson plan, physics pedagogy, TPACK

Abstract

Developing a lesson plan (LP) is a critical task for pre-service teachers, and the quality of the LP directly impacts instructional effectiveness and helps organize student-centered learning activities. Consequently, lesson planning research has attracted significant attention globally. Current research directions focus on the LP framework, lesson planning competence, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) integration, and factors influencing LP development. Despite its importance, the competence of pre-service physics teachers in applying ICT to lesson planning has received little scholarly investigation. The study aims to propose ICT applications in physics LPs that align with the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model, empowering pre-service teachers to effectively integrate ICT into their design. Furthermore, it proposes a rubric to assess ICT application competence in physics LPs. The research methodology utilized the e-Delphi method to develop the assessment rubric and theoretical analysis to identify behavioral indicators for developing LPs that meet TPACK standards. Additionally, a pedagogical experiment was conducted to validate the alignment between these behavioral indicators and student competencies. The research results have identified a rubric for assessing ICT application indicators and defined specific indicators within the TK, CK, PK, TCK, PCK,TPK, and TPACK components when developing physics LPs. These findings are significant as they provide physics education students with a framework for self-assessment and guidance. Moreover, the results contribute to improving teacher training programs by providing a standardized basis for evaluating lesson planning competencies through specific behavioral indicators described in the TPACK model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Savage J, (2014). Lesson Planning: Key concepts and skills for teachers. Routledge, p.3.

[2] Jamali A, (2014). The important role of the lesson plan on the educational achievement of Iranian EFL teachers' attitudes. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(5), 25-30.

[3] Sehweil M, Mahmoud S & Jeidi M, (2022). The importance of the lesson plan elements in education and teachers’ practices of them, In Radical Solutions in Palestinian Higher Education: Research from An-Najah National University, Springer, 93-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0101-0_8.

[4] Farhang Q, Hashemi A & Ghorianfar A, (2023). Lesson plan and its importance in the teaching process. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(08), 5901-5913. DOI: 10.47191/ijcsrr/V6-i8-57.

[5] Ministry of Education and Training, (2020). Appendix 4, Official dispatch No.5512/BGDĐT-GDTrH on Building and organizing the implementation of the school’s educational plans.

[6] Ngo TT, (2025). Implementing lesson plan development activities for high school physics in response to evaluation criteria. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 230(04), 204-211. DOI: 10.34238/tnu-jst.

[7] Kieu TL, Tran MN, Dang TTH, Doan TTH, Tran BH, Phan TT, Le QN, (2024). International experience in building teaching plans under the Blended learning model and recommendations for Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 20(01), 73-80. DOI: 10.15625/2615-8957/12410111.

[8] Roberts S, (2020). Blended learning lesson plans. New Readers Press. p. 3.https://www.newreaderspress.com/site/Additional%20Resources/2020-12_NRP-BlendedLearning-LessonPlanSamples.pdf.

[9] Duong TMH, (2024). Designing the lesson plan for teaching writing in high school based on the TPACK model. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 20(8), 42-49. DOI:10.15625/2615-8957/12410807.

[10] Özdilek Z & Robeck EC, (2018). Enabling pre-service chemistry teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through case-based lesson planning. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 32(1), 207-225. DOI:10.19171/uefad.533233.

[11] Jacob MFA, Fandim JV, Reis FJ, Hartvigsen J, Ferreira PH & Saragiotto BT, (2025). Defining core competencies for telehealth in healthcare higher education: A Delphi study. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 75, 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103244.

[12] Barrios M, Guilera G, Nuño L & Gómez-Benito J, (2021). Consensus in the Delphi method: What makes a decision change?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 1-10.DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120484.

[13] Wernke S & Zierer K, (2017). Lesson planning: A forgotten area of competence (In German:Die Unterrichtsplanung: Ein in Vergessenheit geratener kompetenzbereich). Verlag Julius Klinkhardt, p. 11.

[14] Trinh TG & Mai QK, (2019). Training teaching competence for teacher students of education universities based on a competence approach to meet the requirements of general education reforms. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 22, 34-39.

[15] Pham TKA, (2020). Teaching competence framework for young teachers in high schools, as required by educational renewal. HNUE Journal of Science, 65(1), 64-73. DOI:10.18173/2354-1075.2020-0007.

[16] Lyon LJ, (2015). Development of teaching expertise viewed through the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 88-105. DOI:10.14434/josotl.v15i1.12866.

[17] Shulman LS, (1986). Knowledge growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004.

[18] Mishra P & Koehler MJ, (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.

[19] Lyublinskaya I & Kaplon-Schilis A, (2022). Analysis of differences in the levels of TPACK: Unpacking performance indicators in the TPACK levels rubric. Education Sciences, 12(79),1-20. DOI: 10.3390/educsci12020079.

[20] Koenig J, Heine S, Jaeger-Biela D & Rothland M, (2024). ICT integration in teachers’ lesson plans: A scoping review of empirical studies. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4),821-849. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2022.2138323.

[21] Arsad B, Asham BJ, Saparuddin S, Nur Aisyah A, Muh A, (2023). The correlation between lesson planning and knowledge in order to use TPACK in school teachers in Makassar city. Biology Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 94-108. DOI: 10.35580/btl.v6i2.54039.

[22] Kapici HO & Akcay H, (2023). Improving student teachers’ TPACK self-efficacy through lesson planning practice in the virtual platform. Educational Studies, 49(1), 76-98. DOI:10.1080/03055698.2020.1835610.

[23] Ngo TT, Nguyen TPL, Nguyen AL & Le TQP, (2024). Transformation in the application of information technology in teaching high school physics. HPU2 Journal of Science: Education Science, 2(03), 248-248.

[24] Fiolhais C & Trindade J, (1998). Use of computers in physics education. New technologies for higher education: proceedings, 103-115.

[25] Esquembre F, (2002). Computers in physics education. Computer Physics Communications,147(1-2), 13-18. DOI: 10.3991/ijep.v6i3.5899.

[26] Srisawasdi N, (2012). The role of TPACK in physics classroom: case studies of preservice physics teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3235-3243. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.043.

[27] Vaara R & Sasaki D, (2019). Teaching kinematic graphs in an undergraduate course using an active methodology mediated by video analysis. Lumat: International Journal on Math, Science, and Technology Education, 7(1), 1-26. DOI: 10.31129/Lumat.7.1.374.

[28] Pham VH & Tran Q, (2024). Building interaction experiments on the screen through tracker video analysis software in teaching the “Kinematic” and “Oblication” sections–11th-gradephysics to develop students’ physics competence. TNU Journal of Science and Technology,229(01/S), 149 - 156. DOI: 10.34238/tnu-jst.9272.

[29] Le PT, Dang T, Lam TH & Vu VT, (2020). Integrating digital pedagogical methods in teaching and learning activities towards education 4.0. Journal of Educational, 481, 18-23.

[30] Vieriu AM & Petrea G, (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 1-22. DOI: 10.3390/educsci15030343.

[31] Vu XH, (2011). Vocational teachers' teaching capacities towards the performance approach. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 72, 41-44.

[32] Duong HC & Le HC (2018). Developing primary education students’ teaching competence. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 30, 13-18.

[33] Ngo TT, (2016). Blended learning models and their application in teaching electromagnetic induction in Grade 11. Journal of Science of HNUE, 61(6), 69-78. DOI: 10.18173/2354-1075.2016-0050.

[34] Ministry of Education and Training, (2018). Physics subject - General Education Program issued with Circular 32/2018/TT-BGDDT. p. 31-33.

[35] Ministry of Education and Training, (2025). Issued Circular No. 02/2025/TT-BGDDT stipulating the Digital Competency Framework for learners, p. 2-5.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Educational Sciences: Natural Science

How to Cite

Ngoc Chat, T., Trong Tue, N. and Duy Hai, T. (2026) “THE COMPETENCE OF APPLYING INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN DEVELOPING LESSON PLANSOF PHYSICS PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS”, Journal of Science Educational Science, 71(2), pp. 127–142. doi:10.18173/2354-1075.2026-0031.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 114

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.