DEVELOPING TEACHERS' PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: A STUDY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF BUILDING A SUPPORTIVE WORKING ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0048Keywords:
psychological capital (psycap), teachers' psychological capital, supportive working environmentAbstract
This study employs document analysis and synthesis, theoretical systematization, theoretical evaluation, and comparative analysis to elucidate the concepts of psychological capital (PsyCap), teachers' psychological capital, and a supportive working environment, thereby examining the relationships among these factors within the current educational context. The findings indicate that a supportive working environment-encompassing career development policies, workload reduction, and the cultivation of a positive organizational culture-plays a crucial role in enhancing teachers' PsyCap. Additionally, school leadership is identified as a key determinant in providing direction, empowerment, motivation, and sustaining a positive work environment, thereby fostering PsyCap components such as hope, self-efficacy, resilience, and optimism. In the era of digital transformation, school leaders must adopt strategic approaches to support teachers in adapting to technological advancements, innovating teaching methodologies, and optimizing human resources. This study contributes to the scientific and practical foundation for educational administrators in designing effective working environments, promoting sustainable teacher development, and enhancing overall educational quality.
Downloads
References
[1] PT Hương, NT Long, & ĐH Vũ. (2021). Áp lực công việc của giáo viên trung học phổ thông tại TP HCM. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Sư Phạm TP Hồ Chí Minh, 18(8), 1470–1484.
[2] PTT Trang. (2020). Thực trạng áp lực lao động nghề nghiệp của giáo viên tiểu học. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, Số 32, tháng 8/2020.
[3] Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
[4] Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.595
[5] Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3–9). Oxford University Press.
[6] Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the competitive human edge. Oxford University Press.
[7] Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Clapp‑Smith, R., & Li, W. (2008). More evidence on the value of Chinese workers’ psychological capital: A potentially unlimited competitive resource? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(5), 818–827.
[8] Culbertson, S. S., Fullagar, C. J., & Mills, M. J. (2010). Feeling good and doing great: The relationship between psychological capital and well‑being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(4), 421.
[9] Grover, S. L., Teo, S. T., Pick, D., Roche, M., & Newton, C. J. (2018). Psychological capital as a personal resource in the JD‑R model. Personnel Review, 47(4), 968–984.
[10] Santosa, A. B., Nusantara, A., Nawatmi, S., & Sebastian, F. (2022). The influence of psychological capital and person–organization fit on teacher performance with organizational commitment as mediation. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 22(1), 11–17.
[11] Ma, Y. (2023). Boosting teacher work engagement: The mediating role of psychological capital through emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1240943.
[12] Thu, N. T. H., & Hiến, N. V. (2023). Tác động của yếu tố vốn tâm lý đến hiệu suất làm việc của giảng viên các trường đại học khu vực Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Tài chính–Marketing, 59–71.
[13] Taheri, E., Shirzad, K., Afsahi, F., & Kouhsari, M. (2024). The effect of teacher emotional labor on commitment: The mediating role of teacher psychological capital in Iranian primary schools. Educational Studies, 60(2), 199–215.
[14] Zhou, X., & Zheng, S. (2022). Psychological capital relates with teacher enjoyment: The mediating role of reappraisal. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 879312.
[15] ĐT Thành. (2023). Mối liên hệ giữa vốn tâm lý và cảm nhận hạnh phúc của giáo viên [Luận văn thạc sĩ, Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội & Nhân văn].
[16] Paloș, R., Sava, S. L., & Vîrgă, D. (2020). The role of teacher support, students' need satisfaction, and their psychological capital in enhancing students’ self‑regulated learning. Studia Psychologica, 62(1), 44–57.
[17] Jiao, J. (2021, June). New requirements of teacher professionalization for emotional labor and psychological capital in the age of artificial intelligence. In 2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE) (pp. 184–187). IEEE.
[18] Raja Roy Singh. (1994). Nền giáo dục cho thế kỉ XXI: Những triển vọng của Châu Á‑Thái Bình Dương. Nhà in Đại học Tổng hợp, Hà Nội.
[19] Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
[20] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
[21] Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. Teachers College Press.
[22] Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525.
[23] Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27–35.
[24] Thắm, P. T. H. (n.d.). Thực trạng áp lực lao động nghề nghiệp của giáo viên trung học cơ sở trong giai đoạn thực thi Chương trình Giáo dục phổ thông 2018. [Luận văn/không có năm xuất bản rõ].
[25] Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
[26] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
[27] Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. Falmer Press.
[28] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self‑determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well‑being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
[29] Ph Quang, P. H. (2006). Môi trường giáo dục. Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục, Hà Nội.
[30] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands‑Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
[31] Edo, B. L., & Nwosu, I. C. (2018). Working environment and teachers’ productivity in secondary schools in Port Harcourt Metropolis. International Journal of Innovative Psychology & Social Development, 6(4), 39–49.
[32] Farooqi, K. T. M., & Waqar, A. (2019). Relationship of workplace environment with secondary school teachers’ morale. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 13(1), 12–19.
[33] Desiriani, D., Kristiawan, M., & Wardiah, D. (2023). The influence of self‑efficacy and work environment on teacher’s professional competence. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 4(1), 120–131.
[34] Agustini, E., Ahmad, S., & Eddy, S. (2023). The effect of education and training and work environment on teachers’ performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 4(3), 888–896.
[35] Masdianah, M., Syahid, A., Saloom, G., & Moormann, P. P. (2023). Psychological capital and principal leadership style on teachers’ performance in Indonesian madrasah: Job satisfaction as a mediator. Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 9(2), 336–350.
[36] Drucker, P. (2012). Management challenges for the 21st century. Routledge.
