MULTIPLE OPPOSITIONS APPROACH USED IN SPEECH THERAPY OF CHILDREN WITH SPEECH SOUND DISORDERS: REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR USING IN VIETNAMESE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2024-0097aKeywords:
Multiple Oppositions, speech sound disorders, review, VietnameseAbstract
Speech sound disorder presents difficulties in speech sound perception, representation (articulatory planning), and articulation affecting intelligibility of speech when communicating. Many intervention approaches have been used effectively in the intervention of children's speech sounds, including the Multiple Oppositions Intervention. By using narrative review on international publications, this article describes the Multiple Oppositions Intervention approach including definition, implementation steps and empirical evidence for the efficacy of this approach. This approach consists of four implementation phases: (1) Familiarization and production of the contrast sets, (2) Focused practice of production of the contrasts from imitation to spontaneous; (3) Production of the contrasts within communicative contexts; and (4) Conversational recasts. Based on the review results, this article also presents recommendations for the use of this approach in speech therapy for Vietnamese-speaking children. Further studies are essential to examine the use of this approach in the Vietnamese language.
Downloads
References
[1] Williams AL, McLeod S & McCauley R J, (2021). Interventions for speech sound disorders in children (2nd edition). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
[2] Eadie P, Morgan A, Ukoumunne OC, Ttofari Eecen K, Wake M & Reilly S, (2015). Speech sound disorder at 4 years: Prevalence, comorbidities, and predictors in a community cohort of children. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 57(6), 578-584.
[3] McLeod S & Baker E, (2017). Children’s speech evidence-based practice assessment and intervention. Pearson
[4] Williams AL, (2004). A multiple oppositions intervention approach. In K. M. Bleile (Ed.) Manual of Articulation and Phonological Disorders (pp.331-335). Thomson Delmar Learning.
[5] Williams AL, (2000). Multiple oppositions: Case studies of variables in phonological intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9(4), 289-299.
[6] Williams AL, (2000). Multiple oppositions: Theoretical foundations for an alternative contrastive intervention approach. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9(4), 282-288.
[7] Williams AL, (1991). Generalization patterns associated with training least phonological knowledge. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(4), 722-733.
[8] Williams AL, (1993). Phonological reorganization: A qualitative measure of phonological improvement. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2(2), 44-51.
[9] HV Quyên, TT Tâm, NTT Hương, TTM Diễm, CP Anh (2019). Đặc điểm âm lơi nói của trẻ bị rối loạn âm lời nói đến khám tại Bệnh viện nhi đồng 1 và Trường Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc Thạch từ tháng 01 đến tháng 6 năm 2018. Tạp chí Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Mnh, 23(4), 199-202.
[10] PT Vấn (2021). Đặc điểm âm lời nói của trẻ có rối loạn âm lời nói ở một số tỉnh miền bắc Việt Nam. Luận văn thạc sĩ y học kĩ thuật phục hồi chức năng, Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
[11] Tang G & Barlow J, (2006). Characteristics of the sound systems of monolingual Vietnamese-speaking children with phonological impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20(6), 423-445.
[12] Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo (2010). Chuẩn phát triển của trẻ em 5 tuổi.
[13] Williams AL, (2003). Speech disorders: Resource guide for preschool children. Thomson Delmar Learning.
[14] Williams AL, (2012). Intensity in phonological intervention: Is there a prescribed amount?. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(5), 456-461.
[15] Williams AL, & Kalbfleisch, J, (2001). Phonological intervention using a multiple opposition approach. Poster presented at the ASHA Convention.
[16] Williams AL, (2005). Assessment, target selection, and intervention: dynamic interactions within a systemic perspective. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(3), 231-242.
[17] Cathell V & Ruscello DM, (2004, November). Sound system disorders: teaching broad versus deep. Presentation at ASHA Convention.
[18] Ceron MI & Keske-Soares M, (2013). Mudanças fonológicas obtidas no tratamento pelo modelo de oposições múltiplas [Phonological changes obtained in the treatment based on the multiple oppositions approach]. Revista CEFAC, 15, 314-323.
[19] Riddle LS & Stockman S, (2009). A case for contrasts: Using evidence-based practice in phonological treatment. Presentation at the ASHA convention.
[20] Pagliarin KC, Mota HB & Keske-Soares M, (2009). Therapeutic efficacy analysis of three contrastive approach phonological models. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica, 21, 297-302.
[21] Allen MM, (2013). Intervention efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorder. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56(3), 865-877.
[22] Lee SAS, (2018). The treatment efficacy of multiple opposition phonological approach via telepractice for two children with severe phonological disorders in rural areas of West Texas in the USA. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 34(1), 63-78.
[23] Sugden E, Baker E, Williams AL, Munro N & Trivette CM, (2020). Evaluation of parent-and speech-language pathologist–delivered multiple oppositions intervention for children with phonological impairment: A multiple-baseline design study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1), 111-126.
