ANALYZING LEARNER INTERLANGUAGE DISCOURSE WITH AI: FACILITATING NOTICING IN THE EFL CLASSROOM
DOI:
https://doi.org/0.18173/2354-1075.2026-0020Keywords:
Noticing Hypothesis, interlanguage discourse, EFL speaking, discourse analysis, AI-mediated feedback, ChatGPT in educationAbstract
Schmidt’s (1990, 2001) Noticing Hypothesis proposes that conscious awareness of gaps in output is necessary for second language development. This classroom-based action research study operationalizes that principle in spoken EFL by integrating structured discourse analysis with AI-supported feedback. Twenty-two Japanese university students recorded five-minute English conversations at the beginning and midpoint of a seven-week applied linguistics course. Using predefined analytic definitions, students manually analyzed transcripts for macro-structure, speech-act “interacts,” exchange patterns, and embedded story sub-genres before comparing their analyses with AI-generated categorizations using standardized ChatGPT prompts. Quantitative summaries served as descriptive indicators of change, while structured reflections provided primary evidence of noticing. Across the instructional cycle, conversations showed a modest increase in total word production (6,951 → 7,287 words overall), increased follow-up information and clarification moves, and more frequent and more deliberately structured storytelling (7 of 22 → 20 of 22 students). Reflections indicated heightened awareness of pre-closings, turn balance, limited elaboration, and narrative sequencing. A post-course questionnaire (N = 22) further indicated that learners perceived AI as a useful analytic mediator, though requiring critical oversight. Rather than claiming causal effectiveness, the study documents how AI-mediated discourse analysis can make conversational architecture visible and support structured noticing within communicative classrooms. The findings highlight the pedagogical potential and practical limitations of integrating generative AI into discourse-focused EFL instruction.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen, Z., Wei, W., & Zou, D, (2025). Generative AI technology and language learning: Global language learners’ responses to ChatGPT videos in social media. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication.
[2] Ellis, N. C, (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44.
[3] Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A, (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 175–199). Routledge.
[4] Hall, E. T, (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
[5] Johns, T, (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. ELR Journal, 4, 1-16.
[6] Ryan, A. G, (2014). Analysing and assessing the interlanguage conversation of Japanese EFL learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Monash University.
[7] Ryan, A, (2016). Analysis of an interlanguage English conversation: Macrostructure and internal genres. Gaikokugo Kenkyu (Journal of Foreign Language Studies), 49, 127–165.
[8] Schmidt, R. W, (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
[9] Schmidt, R, (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press.
[10] Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M, (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.
[11] Swain, M, (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf, (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.
[12] Ventola, E, (1979). The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 3(3–4), 267–298.
[13] Vygotsky, L. S, (1930/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
