THE FAILURE OF THE WEST TO FILL THE POWER VACUUM IN EAST ASIA: ANGLO–FRENCH RIVALRY ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA, 1866–1887

Các tác giả

  • Ninh Xuan Thao Faculty of History, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi city, Vietnam
  • Tran Ngoc Dung Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics, Hanoi city, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1067.2025-0057

Từ khóa:

East Asia, Korea; power vacuum, French expedition to Korea, Anglo–French rivalry

Tóm tắt

In the late nineteenth century, the race for colonial expansion unfolded across many regions of the world, most notably in Asia and Africa. Although this imperial contest drew in the principal European and American colonial powers, certain areas remained “power vacuums” owing to rival cooperation or the absence of explicit agreements among Western states. The Korean Peninsula during the final decades of the nineteenth century epitomises such a case. Despite their military and diplomatic interventions, both Britain and France failed to construct a sustainable “Western order” on the peninsula, thereby leaving an unfilled “power vacuum” within East Asia. This vacuum was gradually occupied by Japan from the late nineteenth century onwards, especially following the first Sino–Japanese War and, ultimately, through formal annexation in 1910, while the Qing dynasty still retained residual influence and Korea pursued a strategy of “pragmatic balancing.” This paper seeks to analyse the failure of Britain and France in their endeavours to conquer and partition East Asian territories through a case study of Korea between the 1860s and 1880s, and to elucidate the structural and contingent reasons behind this failure, thereby contributing to interpretations of how East Asia’s power structure was transformed amid the colonial expansion of the Western imperial powers and the rise of Japan, which came to replace the West’s regional role during this period.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] Nguyen TH, (2016). The Tributary System in Diplomatic Relations between China and Korea during the Feudal Era. Journal of Japanese and Northeast Asian Studies, 5(183), 37–47 (in Vietnamese).

[2] Larsen KW, (2008). Tradition, Treaties and Trade: Qing Imperialism and Chosŏn Korea, 1850–1910. Harvard University Asia Center.

[3] Gallagher J & Robinson R, (1953). The Imperialism of Free Trade. The Economic History Review, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2591017

[4] Darwin J, (1997). Imperialism and the Victorians: The Dynamics of Territorial Expansion. The English Historical Review, 112(447), 614–642.

[5] Kaufman S, Little R & Wohlforth WC, (2007). The Balance of Power in World History. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

[6] Nexon DH, (2009). The Balance of Power in the Balance. World Politics, 61(2), 330–359.

[7] Kang DC, (2010). East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. Columbia University Press.

[8] Schmid A, (2002). Korea Between Empires, 1895–1919. Columbia University Press.

[9] Osterhammel J, (2014). The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton University Press.

[10] Bickers R, (2011). The Scramble for China: Foreign Devils in the Qing Empire, 1832–1914. Penguin Group.

[11] Luong N (Chef Editor), (2015). Southeast Asia – History from the Origins to the Present Day. National Political Publishing House – Truth, Hanoi (in Vietnamese).

[12] You Y-t, Park J-w & Park T-g, (Ha MT Translated), (2020). A Perspective on Modern and Contemporary East Asia. Writers’ Association Publishing House, Hanoi (in Vietnamese).

[13] Zuber H, (1873). Une expédition en Corée. Le Tour du Monde, 25, 401–416. https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Une_exp%C3%A9dition_en_Cor%C3%A9e

[14] Kim S-h, (1988). La question de Port Hamilton (1885–1887) dans le contexte de la politique étrangère des grandes puissances. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris I.

[15] Jin S, (2017). The Port Hamilton (Geomundo) Incident (1885–1887): Retracing Another Great Game in Eurasia. The International History Review, 41(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2017.1409791

[16] Royle SA, (2016). Anglo-Korean Relations and the Port Hamilton Affair, 1885–1887. Routledge.

[17] Kim Y-g, (2001). The Five Years’ Crisis, 1866–1871: Korea in the Maelstrom of Western Imperialism. Publisher Cir.

[18] Nguyen VK, (2023). Japan’s Isolation Policy during the Tokugawa Period – Causes and Consequences. The Gioi Publishers, Hanoi (in Vietnamese).

[19] Đinh TH, (2025, July 15). The Maritime Prohibition Policy and Its Social Impacts in China under the Qing Dynasty (1644–1911). https://vihc.vn/san-pham/chinh-sach-hai-cam-va-nhung-tac-dong-den-xa-hoi-cua-trung-quoc-duoi-thoi-nha-thanh-1644-1911/ (in Vietnamese).

[20] Mayers WF, (1902). Treaties Between the Empire of China and Foreign Powers (4th ed.). North-China Herald, Shanghai.

[21] Dinh TH, (2022). The Qing Dynasty’s Response to Western Colonial Invasions from the 19th to the Early 20th Century. Chinese Studies Journal, 5 (in Vietnamese).

[22] Hsu ICY, (1970). The Rise of Modern China. Oxford University Press.

[23] Vu DN, (2010). Revisiting Franco–Vietnamese–Chinese Relations through the Treaties of the Late 19th Century. Journal of Historical Studies, 8.

[24] Masuda E. (Nguyễn DC translated), (2021). The Last Siamese Missions to China (1851–1854) and the Rejection of the Tributary System. Da Nang Journal of Socio-Economic Development, 142 (in Vietnamese).

[25] Nguyen VT, (2010). Revisiting Siam’s “Land-for-Peace” Diplomacy in Relations with Britain and France from the Late 19th to the Early 20th Century. Hue University Journal of Science, 60 (in Vietnamese).

[26] Nguyễn VK, (2004). Japan’s Three Openings – Three Choices. Journal of Historical Studies, 5 (in Vietnamese).

[27] Duong VH & Cao NKH, (2020). Korea’s Opening Policy toward Japan and Western Countries from 1876 to 1895. Northeast Asian Studies Journal, 7(233) (in Vietnamese).

[28] Gomane J-P, (n.d.). L’expédition de l’Amiral Roze en Corée en 1866. https://www.napoleon.org/histoire-des-2-empires/articles/lexpedition-de-lamiral-roze-en-coree-en-1866/

[29] Nguyen QH, (2009). The Anti-Christian Policy of the Nguyen Dynasty in a Regional Context: A Comparative Study with Korea. Journal of Religious Studies, 7–8.

[30] Mériaux J, (2022). La redécouverte du passé impérialiste français en Asie : une mémoire encombrante – L’exemple des manuscrits uigwe oegyujanggak, du pillage à la restitution. Master Management des Institutions Culturelles, Sciences Po Lille.

[31] French Campaign against Korea, 1866, (2024, April 11). https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/French_Campaign_against_Korea,_1866

[32] Kane DC, (2011). Bellonet and Roze: Overzealous Servants of Empire and the 1866 French Attack on Korea. Korean Studies, 23(1), 1–23.

[33] Rausch F, (2019). “A Shrewd Man of Business”: Frederick Jenkins and the Oppert Incident. The Review of Korean Studies, 22(2), 125–152.

[34] Kang J-e, (n.d.). The Land of Scholars: Two Thousand Years of Korean Confucianism. Homa & Sekey Books, USA.

[35] Hopkirk P, (1992). The Great Game: The Struggle for Empire in Central Asia. Kodansha International, New York.

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

2025-10-28

Số

Chuyên mục

Bài viết

Cách trích dẫn

Xuan Thao, N., & Ngoc Dung, T. (2025). THE FAILURE OF THE WEST TO FILL THE POWER VACUUM IN EAST ASIA: ANGLO–FRENCH RIVALRY ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA, 1866–1887. Journal of Science Social Science, 70(4), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1067.2025-0057