THE EXOTIC AND THE EXPLORER: A MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS OF IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION IN A VIETNAMESE STREET FOOD REVIEW VIDEO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1067.2025-0052Từ khóa:
identity construction, Vietnamese street food, Multimodal Discourse AnalysisTóm tắt
This study investigates the multimodal construction of identity in food media, specifically analyzing how verbal, visual, and paralinguistic modes interact to represent identities. Focusing on the most viewed YouTube review video about Vietnamese street food, the research applies Systemic Functional Linguistics to uncover social, individual, role, and lifestyle identities based on van Leeuwen’s framework of identity (2022). Findings reveal that these multimodal elements work synergistically to create an immersive experience where the food is constructed as an exotic culinary experience in relation to its perceived otherness from mainstream norms. Concurrently, reviewers leverage these resources to manifest their own identities as professional media personalities, adventurous food explorers, and expressive critics. This dual identity construction highlights how food media not only portrays diverse cuisines but also shapes public perception within digital discourse. This study contributes to the global appreciation for Vietnamese street food, thereby providing a new academic model for multimodal analysis of food media and offering practical insights for content creators to craft more convincing and authentic portrayals that challenge cultural stereotypes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
[1] Tam Anh, (2025). TasteAtlas ranks Vietnamese street foods among the best in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from https://e.vnexpress.net/photo/food-recipes/tasteatlas-ranks-vietnamese-street-foods-among-the-best-in-southeast-asia-4856205.html
[2] Nguyen Q, (2019). Netflix series on Asian street food focuses on Saigon. Retrieved from https://e.vnexpress.net/news/travel/food-recipes/netflix-series-on-asian-street-food-focuses-on-saigon-3908602.html
[3] Cohen M, (2024). Food Identity. Journal of Food Law & Policy, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.54119/jflp.vmbu3563
[4] Stano S, (2023). Food, Ideology and Critical Semiotics. Lexia, 41–42, 307–322.
[5] Anderson EN, (2014). Everyone Eats: Understanding Food and Culture. New York: NYU Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/28733
[6] Ranta R & Ichijo A, (2022). Food, National Identity, and Nationalism: From Everyday to Global Politics. Springer.
[7] Jewitt C, Bezemer J & O’Halloran K, (2025). Introducing multimodality (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
[8] Van Leeuwen T, (2022). Multimodality and Identity (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186625
[9] Bucholtz M & Hall K, (2004). Language and identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 369–394). Blackwell.
[10] Reddy G & van Dam RM, (2020). Food, culture, and identity in multicultural societies: Insights from Singapore. Appetite, 149, 104633.
[11] İkizoğlu D & Gordon C, (2022). “Vegetables as a Chore”: Constructing and Problematizing a “Picky Eater” Identity Online. In Tovares A & Gordon C (Eds.), Identity and Ideology in Digital Food Discourse (pp. 13–32). Bloomsbury Academic.
[12] Wang Y, (2024). The Impact of Product Review Videos on Electronics Consumers. Published thesis.
[13] Xu P, Chen L & Santhanam R, (2015). Will video be the next generation of e-commerce product reviews? Decision Support Systems, 73, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.03.001
[14] Jaakkola M, (2020). Useful Creativity: Vernacular Reviewing on the Video-Sharing Platform Vimeo. Culture Unbound, 12(2), 373–392.
[15] Cheng S, (2024). A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages, 10(3), 623–667. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0026
[16] Sahelices-Pinto C, Lanero-Carrizo A, Vázquez-Burguete JL & Gutierrez-Rodriguez P, (2017). eWOM and 2.0 Opinion Leaders in the Food Context: A Study with a Sample of Spanish Food-Related Weblogs. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 24(3), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2017.1266561
[17] Bi NC, (2018). Product review videos on YouTube as eWOM. In Ha L (Ed.), The Audience and Business of YouTube and Online Videos (pp. 59–72). Rowman & Littlefield.
[18] Briliana V, Ruswidiono W & Deitiana T, (2020). Do Millennials Believe in Food Vlogger Reviews? Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 5(3), 170–178.
[19] Halliday MAK & Matthiessen CMI, (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
[20] Liang WJ & Lim FV, (2024). Representing youth as vulnerable social media users: a social semiotic analysis of promotional materials from The Social Dilemma. Semiotica, 256, 153–174.
[21] Kress G & van Leeuwen T, (2021). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
[22] Ngo T, Hood S, Martin JR, Painter C, Smith B & Zappavigna M, (2022). Modelling paralanguage from the perspective of systemic functional semiotics: Theory and application. Bloomsbury.
[23] Martin JR & White PR, (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
[24] Zhang D, (2009). On a Synthetic Theoretical Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Foreign Languages in China, 6(1), 24–30.
[25] Zhang F, (2022). Meaning Construction of Multimodal Synergy in Documentary Discourse: Taking The Lockdown: One Month in Wuhan as an Example. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(6), 52–60.
[26] Lu Y, (2024). Multimodal Discourse Analysis of the Promotional Film Countdown: Beginning of Spring for the Opening Ceremony of Beijing Winter Olympics. International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 4(4), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijllc.4.4.3
[27] Avieli N, (2011). Making Sense of Vietnamese Cuisine. Education About Asia, 16(3), 42–45.
[28] Kathpalia SS, (2021). Persuasive Genres: Old and New Media (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243721
