MICROSATELLITE HYBRID STRUCTURE USING ALUMINUM 7075-T6 AND CFRP FOR IMPROVED LAUNCH PERFORMANCE SURVIVABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1059.2025-0054Keywords:
microsatellite, hybrid structure, aluminum 7075-T6, CFRP, vibration analysis, finite element simulationAbstract
This study presents the structural design and simulation of a 50 kg-class microsatellite developed for compatibility with the JAXA Epsilon launch vehicle. A hybrid architecture combining Aluminum 7075-T6 and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) was employed to meet stringent mass, stiffness, and vibration requirements. The final structure, measuring 480 × 488 × 550 mm, achieved a total mass of 45 kg, falling within the required launch envelope. Finite element simulations were conducted using ANSYS 2024R2 to evaluate modal, sine-sweep, random vibration, and shock responses under launch-induced conditions. The first three natural frequencies, 118.99 Hz (X-axis), 123.77 Hz (Y-axis), and 240.42 Hz (Z-axis), surpassed the required thresholds, avoiding resonance with vehicle-induced excitations. Vibration analyses confirmed that peak acceleration responses remained within safe operational margins, with sine-sweep, random vibration, and shock responses showing no modal amplification. Component-level stress simulations revealed von Mises stress values well below material limits across all critical subsystems. These results validate the structural integrity and dynamic survivability of the hybrid microsatellite, demonstrating its readiness for spaceflight.
References
[1] Saito T, Kuwahara T, Saito Y & Sato Y, (2025). Guidance strategies for controlled Earth reentry of small spacecraft in low Earth orbit. Acta Astronautica, 229, 684-697.
[2] Gomez I, Aplin KL, Lawrie A & Toomer CA, (2024). Modelling an Ion Thruster for a Small Spacecraft in Very Low Earth Orbit. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (IOP Publishing), 2702(1), 012019.
[3] Sedelinkov A, Nikolaeva A, Serdakova V & Khnyryova E, (2024). Technologies for Increasing the Control Efficiency of Small Spacecraft with Solar Panels by Taking into Account Temperature Shock. Technologies, 12(10), 207.
[4] Mahendrakar T, White RT, Tiwari M & Wilde M, (2024). Unknown non-cooperative spacecraft characterization with lightweight convolutional neural networks. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 21(5), 455-460.
[5] Ince JC, Peerzada M, Mathews LD, Pai AR, Al-Qatatsheh A, Abbasi S & Salim NV, (2023). Overview of emerging hybrid and composite materials for space applications. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, 6(4), 130.
[6] Oropeza D, Seager T, Firdosy S, Guerra J, Billings K, Jones JP & Roberts S, (2024). Porosity control of copper-based alloys via powder bed fusion additive manufacturing for spacecraft applications. Journal of Porous Materials, 31(2), 779-791.
[7] Goto A, Umeda K, Yukumatsu K & Kimoto Y, (2021). Property changes in materials due to atomic oxygen in the low Earth orbit. CEAS Space Journal, 13(3), 415-432.
[8] Pernigoni L & Grande AM, (2023). Advantages and challenges of novel materials for future space applications. Frontiers in Space Technologies, 4, 1253419.
[9] Nishihara K, Okuyama KI, Rodriguez R & Fajardo I, (2024). The Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Exposed to a Low Earth Orbit Environment. Aerospace, 11(3), 201.
[10] Lopresti S, Abiti A, Olivieri L, Giacomuzzo C, Polli EM & Francesconi A, (2024). A Numerical Model for CFRP Fragmentation Under Hypervelocity Impacts. 75th International Astronautical Congress, 1-9.
[11] Di Trani N, Masini A, Bo T, Paci MM, Batra JS, Reggiani M & Grattoni A, (2024). Probing physicochemical performances of 3D printed carbon fiber composites during 8‐month exposure to space environment. Advanced Functional Materials, 34(13), 2310243.
[12] Watson E, Murillo JLS, Durr N & Ledford N, (2024). Simulating impact-induced satellite breakups with a discrete element method. Acta Astronautica, 219, 428-437.
