CLIMATE CHANGE COMMUNICATION - FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: CURRENT STATUS, TRENDS,AND SOLUTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1067.2026-0018Keywords:
climate change, communication, global perspectiveAbstract
This study examined the current status, trends, and solutions in climate change communication (CCC) from a global perspective, with a focus on its practical implementation in Vietnam. CCC has evolved from a primary focus on scientific data to a more audience-centered approach, incorporating visual storytelling. However, this field faces significant challenges, including political polarization in climate change perceptions, the spread of misinformation on digital platforms, and difficulties in translating complex scientific content into accessible messages. Given that Vietnam is among the most climate-vulnerable countries, improving the effectiveness of CCC remained imperative. This study proposes leveraging digital technology, establishing fact-checking mechanisms, tailoring communication messages for specific audience groups, and strengthening collaboration among stakeholders to ensure accurate information dissemination, ultimately fostering public awareness and promoting adaptive responses to climate change.
References
[1] MAR Anwar, A Zhou, Sajjad & F Asmi, (2019). Climate change communication as political agenda and voters' behavior. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(29), 29946 - 29961.
[2] J Hansen, M Sato, R Ruedy, K Lo, DW Lea & M Medina-Elizade, (2006). Global temperature change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(39), 14288 - 14293.
[3] BM Campbell, SJ Vermeulen, PK Aggarwal, C Corner-Dolloff, E Girvetz, AM Loboguerrero, J Ramirez-Villegas, T Rosenstock, L Sebastian, PK Thornton & E Wollenberg, (2016). Reducing risks to food security from climate change. Global Food Security, 11, 34 - 43.
[4] SM Jang & PS Hart, (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11 - 17.
[5] D Caled & MJ Silva, (2022). Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5(1), 123 - 159.
[6] MR Salem, N Hegazy, AA Thabet Mohammed, E Mahrous Hassan, M M Saad Abdou & MM Zein, (2022). Climate change-related knowledge and attitudes among a sample of the general population in Egypt. Front Public Health, 10, 1047301.
[7] M Wu, R Long, S Yang, X Wang & H Chen, (2022). Evolution of the knowledge mapping of climate change communication research: Basic status, research hotspots, and prospects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,19(18).
[8] MT Boykoff & JM Boykoff, (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press.Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125 - 136.
[9] JR Porter, AJ Challinor, CB Henriksen, SM Howden, P Martre & P Smith, (2019). Invited review: Intergovernmental panel on climate Change, agriculture, and food-A case of shifting cultivation and history. Global Change Biology, 25(8), 2518 - 2529.
[10] JT Jalles, (2023). Financial Crises and Climate Change. Comparative Economic Studies, 1 - 25.
[11] WE Bradshaw & CM Holzapfel, (2006). Climate change. Evolutionary response to rapid climate change. Science, 312(5779), 1477 - 1478.
[12] B Bloodhart, E Maibach, T Myers & X Zhao, (2015). Local climate experts: The influence of local TV weather information on climate change perceptions. PLoS One, 10(11), e0141526.
[13] PR Epstein, (2006). An Inconvenient Truth. British Medical Journal, 332(7554), 1397.
[14] AM McCright & RE Dunlap, (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163 -1172.
[15] TTT Hanh, LTT Huong, NTL Huong, TNQ Linh, NH Quyen, NTT Nhung, K Ebi, ND Cuong, HV Nhu, TM Kien, S Hales, DM Cuong, NTT Tho, LQ Toan, NN Bich & HV Minh. Vietnam climate change and health vulnerability and adaptation assessment, (2018). Environmental Health Insights, 14, 1178630220924658.
[16] EM Cody, AJ Reagan, L Mitchell, PS Dodds & CM Danforth, (2015). Climate Change Sentiment on Twitter: An Unsolicited Public Opinion Poll. PLoS One, 10(8), e0136092.
[17] B Duran-Becerra, GC Hillyer, A Cosgrove & C. H. Basch, (2020). Climate change on YouTube: A potential platform for youth learning. Health Promotion Perspectives, 10(3), 282 - 286.
[18] J Hassler, AK Wurst, M Jungblut & K Schlosser (2023). Influence of the pandemic lockdown on Fridays for Future's hashtag activism. New Media and Society, 25(8), 1991 - 2013.
[19] A Wonneberger, MHC Meijers & ART Schuck, (2020). Shifting public engagement: How media coverage of climate change conferences affects climate change audience segments. Public Understanding of Science, 29(2), 176 - 193.
[20] L Huang, K Chen & M Zhou, (2020). Climate change and carbon sink: a bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8), 8740 - 8758.
[21] S Wolf, J Teitge, J Mielke, F Schütze & C Jaeger, (2021). The European green deal - more than climate neutrality. International Economics, 56(2), 99 - 107.
[22] KR Ross, MB Rice & TK Takaro, (2016). The clean power plan: A public health victory needing medical attention. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 193(4), 359 - 361.
[23] JA Mathews, (2012). Green growth strategies - Korean initiatives. Futures, 44(8), 761 - 769.
[24] VnExpress, (2024). Thiệt hại kinh tế do bão Yagi tăng lên 81.500 tỷ đồng. https://vnexpress.net/thiet-hai-kinh-te-do-bao-yagi-tang-len-81-500-ty-dong-4798004.html
[25] World Bank, (2022). Vietnam Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR). World Bank Group
[26] DM Markowitz, R Laha, BP Perone, RD Pea & JN Bailenson, (2018). Immersive virtual reality rield trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2364.
[27] JJ Opperman, RR Camargo, A Laporte-Bisquit, C Zarfl & AJ Morgan, (2022). Using the WWF water risk filter to screen existing and projected hydropower projects for climate and biodiversity risks. Water, 14(5), 721.
[28] BD Douglas & M Brauer, (2021). Gamification to prevent climate change: a review of games and apps for sustainability. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 89 - 94.
[29] R Debnath, R Bardhan, DU Shah, K Mohaddes, MH Ramage, RM Alvarez & BK Sovacool, (2022). Social media enables people-centric climate action in the hard-to-decarbonise building sector. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 19017.
[30] UNICEF Vietnam, (2022). One Minute Green Campaign: From green thinking to green action. United Nations Children's Fund.
[31] Thủ tướng Chính phủ, (2022). Quyết định số 888/QĐ-TTg phê duyệt Đề án về những nhiệm vụ, giải pháp triển khai kết quả Hội nghị lần thứ 26 các bên tham gia Công ước khung của Liên hợp quốc về biến đổi khí hậu (COP26). Cổng thông tin điện tử Chính phủ.
